RadarTrek Intel — monthly score updates
We track 40+ tools so you don't have to. Score changes, new tools, and new guides — once a month, no spam.
Web Hosting comparison · 2026
SiteGround (85) and Cloudways (86) are closely matched — this is one of the tightest Web Hosting comparisons in our database, with just 1 points separating them overall. SiteGround leads on Ease of Use (88 vs 72), while Cloudways has the edge on Scalability (92 vs 70). The two are closest on Uptime, where the gap is just 2 points. On pricing, SiteGround starts cheaper at $4.99/mo versus $14/mo. SiteGround runs on Google Cloud with its own custom caching layer (SuperCacher) and is consistently praised for proactive, technically competent support — though its shared plans enforce strict monthly-visit caps that traffic spikes can hit faster than the plan names suggest. Cloudways doesn't run its own data centers — it's a management layer on top of DigitalOcean, AWS, GCP, Linode, and Vultr, so you get hourly pay-as-you-go billing and the ability to switch underlying cloud providers without migrating your stack. Use the radar chart and dimension table below to find which fits your specific priorities best.
SiteGround
Blazing fast managed hosting with top-tier support
85/100
Cloudways
Managed cloud hosting on AWS, GCP, DigitalOcean
86/100
Radar comparison
SiteGround
85
Cloudways
86
Performance
Load speed and TTFB from independent benchmarks
Uptime
Reliability measured over 12 months
Price / Value
Features and resources per dollar spent
Support
Response time and quality of customer support
Scalability
Ease of upgrading resources and plans
Security
SSL, backups, malware protection, firewalls
Ease of Use
Control panel and onboarding experience
Overall Score
SiteGround
Pros
Cons
Cloudways
Pros
Cons
Choose SiteGround if you value uptime most and have budget for $4.99/month or more. Choose Cloudways if you value uptime most and have budget for $14/month or more. If neither dimension is a clear priority, Cloudways's higher overall score (86/100) makes it the safer default in the web hosting category.
Based on our independent scoring across 7 dimensions, Cloudways scores 86/100 overall versus SiteGround's 85/100 — a 1-point margin. Cloudways leads on Uptime in particular. That said, SiteGround may still be the right choice if the dimensions where it scores higher match your specific priorities — the radar chart above shows the full profile side by side.
SiteGround starts cheaper at $4.99/month versus Cloudways's $14/month. At higher usage tiers, the gap may narrow depending on each tool's scaling model. Check the official pricing pages for current plans — SaaS pricing changes frequently.
SiteGround scores higher on Ease of Use — 88/100 versus 72/100 for Cloudways. If ease of use is your primary decision criterion, SiteGround is the stronger choice in this head-to-head.
Switching between web hosting tools is generally possible but involves migration effort: exporting your data or configuration from SiteGround, re-importing or reconfiguring in Cloudways, and updating any API integrations or environment variables in your codebase. The effort scales with how deeply embedded the tool is in your stack. Test Cloudways on a non-production project first before migrating.
SiteGround (85/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise uptime — its strongest dimension — and who want a low-cost starting price. Cloudways (86/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise uptime and want a low-cost starting price. If both dimensions matter equally, the overall score winner (Cloudways) is the safer default choice.
Need a website built on this stack?
We build Next.js + Supabase + Vercel products. Ready to launch in weeks, not months.