RadarTrek Intel — monthly score updates
We track 40+ tools so you don't have to. Score changes, new tools, and new guides — once a month, no spam.
Databases comparison · 2026
Supabase (89) and Turso (85) are closely matched — this is one of the tightest Databases comparisons in our database, with just 4 points separating them overall. Supabase leads on Ecosystem (92 vs 68). The two are closest on Scalability, where the gap is just 0 points. Both offer a free tier, making either a low-risk starting point. Use the radar chart and dimension table below to find which fits your specific priorities best.
Supabase
Postgres with auth, storage, and realtime built in
89/100
Turso
Edge-replicated SQLite for ultra-low-latency reads
85/100
Radar comparison
Supabase
89
Turso
85
Developer UX
Branching, migrations, dashboard, and local dev experience.
Performance
Query latency and connection handling at scale.
Scalability
Auto-scaling, read replicas, and serverless scale-to-zero.
Price / Value
Free tier generosity and cost at production scale.
Reliability
Backups, point-in-time recovery, and uptime SLA.
Ecosystem
ORM support, extensions, and integration breadth.
Overall Score
Based on our independent scoring across 6 dimensions, Supabase scores 89/100 overall versus Turso's 85/100 — a 4-point margin. Supabase leads on Developer UX in particular. That said, Turso may still be the right choice if the dimensions where it scores higher match your specific priorities — the radar chart above shows the full profile side by side.
Both Supabase and Turso offer a free tier, so entry-level cost is not a differentiating factor. Compare the feature and usage limits of each free plan to see which gives you more headroom before a paid upgrade is needed.
Supabase scores higher on Ecosystem — 92/100 versus 68/100 for Turso. If ecosystem is your primary decision criterion, Supabase is the stronger choice in this head-to-head.
Switching between databases tools is generally possible but involves migration effort: exporting your data or configuration from Supabase, re-importing or reconfiguring in Turso, and updating any API integrations or environment variables in your codebase. The effort scales with how deeply embedded the tool is in your stack. Test Turso on a non-production project first before migrating.
Supabase (89/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise developer ux — its strongest dimension — and who want a free entry point. Turso (85/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise performance and want a free entry point. If both dimensions matter equally, the overall score winner (Supabase) is the safer default choice.
Want this built for your business?
We design and build digital products — web apps, AI tools, SaaS platforms.