RadarTrek Intel — monthly score updates
We track 40+ tools so you don't have to. Score changes, new tools, and new guides — once a month, no spam.
VPNs comparison · 2026
Mullvad (83) and PIA (88) are closely matched — this is one of the tightest VPNs comparisons in our database, with just 5 points separating them overall. PIA has the edge on Device Support (84 vs 70). The two are closest on No-Logs Audit, where the gap is just 3 points. On pricing, PIA starts cheaper at $2.03/mo versus $5.5/mo. Use the radar chart and dimension table below to find which fits your specific priorities best.
Mullvad
Anonymous, flat-rate pricing, no email required
83/100
PIA
Proven no-logs policy with massive server network
88/100
Radar comparison
Mullvad
83
PIA
88
Speed
Download and upload speed loss vs baseline
Privacy
Encryption, jurisdiction, and audit history
Server Network
Number of countries and server locations
Streaming
Netflix, Disney+, BBC iPlayer unblocking rate
Price
Monthly cost and value for features
No-Logs Audit
Independent audit of no-logs policy
Device Support
Number of simultaneous connections and apps
Overall Score
Mullvad
Pros
Cons
PIA
Pros
Cons
Choose Mullvad if you value privacy most and have budget for $5.5/month or more. Choose PIA if you value server network most and have budget for $2.03/month or more. If neither dimension is a clear priority, PIA's higher overall score (88/100) makes it the safer default in the vpns category.
Based on our independent scoring across 7 dimensions, PIA scores 88/100 overall versus Mullvad's 83/100 — a 5-point margin. PIA leads on Privacy in particular. That said, Mullvad may still be the right choice if the dimensions where it scores higher match your specific priorities — the radar chart above shows the full profile side by side.
PIA starts cheaper at $2.03/month versus Mullvad's $5.5/month. At higher usage tiers, the gap may narrow depending on each tool's scaling model. Check the official pricing pages for current plans — SaaS pricing changes frequently.
Mullvad scores higher on Privacy — 98/100 versus 90/100 for PIA. If privacy is your primary decision criterion, Mullvad is the stronger choice in this head-to-head.
Switching between vpns tools is generally possible but involves migration effort: exporting your data or configuration from Mullvad, re-importing or reconfiguring in PIA, and updating any API integrations or environment variables in your codebase. The effort scales with how deeply embedded the tool is in your stack. Test PIA on a non-production project first before migrating.
Mullvad (83/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise privacy — its strongest dimension — and who want a low-cost starting price. PIA (88/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise server network and want a low-cost starting price. If both dimensions matter equally, the overall score winner (PIA) is the safer default choice.
Building a product that needs secure infrastructure?
We architect and deploy secure, privacy-compliant web applications.